4.8 Article

Comparing Ion Exchange Adsorbents for Nitrogen Recovery from Source-Separated Urine

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 51, 期 4, 页码 2373-2381

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b05816

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) through the ReNUWIt Engineering Research Center [CBET-0853512]
  2. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE 1106400]
  3. Ford Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Separate collection of urine, which is only 1% of wastewater volume but contains the majority of nitrogen humans excrete, can potentially reduce the costs and energy input of wastewater treatment and facilitate recovery of nitrogen for beneficial use. Ion exchange was investigated for recovery of nitrogen as ammonium from urine for use as a fertilizer or disinfectant. Cation adsorption curves for four adsorbents (clinoptilolite, biochar, Dowex 50, and Dowex Mac 3) were compared in pure salt solutions, synthetic urine, and real stored urine. Competition from sodium and potassium present in synthetic and real urine did not significantly decrease ammonium adsorption for any of the adsorbents. Dowex 50 and Dowex Mac 3 showed nearly 100% regeneration efficiencies. Estimated ion exchange reactor volumes to capture the nitrogen for 1 week from a four-person household were lowest for Dowex Mac 3 (5 L) and highest for biochar (19 L). Although Dowex Mac 3 had the highest adsorption capacity, material costs ($/g N removed) were lower for clinoptilolite and biochar because of their substantially lower unit cost.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据