3.8 Article

scite: A smart citation index that displays the context of citations and classifies their intent using deep learning

期刊

QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE STUDIES
卷 2, 期 3, 页码 882-898

出版社

MIT PRESS
DOI: 10.1162/qss_a_00146

关键词

bibliometrics; citations; evaluation; machine learning; publishing; scientometrics

资金

  1. NIDA grant [4R44DA050155-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Citation indices, while useful for research evaluation, lack context information which can lead to issues when using citations in research assessment. To address this, scite, an intelligent citation index has been developed to categorize citations based on context, providing insight into how they were used.
Citation indices are tools used by the academic community for research and research evaluation that aggregate scientific literature output and measure impact by collating citation counts. Citation indices help measure the interconnections between scientific papers but fall short because they fail to communicate contextual information about a citation. The use of citations in research evaluation without consideration of context can be problematic because a citation that presents contrasting evidence to a paper is treated the same as a citation that presents supporting evidence. To solve this problem, we have used machine learning, traditional document ingestion methods, and a network of researchers to develop a smart citation index called scite, which categorizes citations based on context. Scite shows how a citation was used by displaying the surrounding textual context from the citing paper and a classification from our deep learning model that indicates whether the statement provides supporting or contrasting evidence for a referenced work, or simply mentions it. Scite has been developed by analyzing over 25 million full-text scientific articles and currently has a database of more than 880 million classified citation statements. Here we describe how scite works and how it can be used to further research and research evaluation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据