4.8 Article

Hexavalent Chromium Generation within Naturally Structured Soils and Sediments

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 51, 期 4, 页码 2058-2067

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04039

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DGE-114747]
  2. US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER), through the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory scientific focus area (SEA) [DE-AC02-76SF00515]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chromium(VI) produced from the oxidation of indigenous Cr(III) minerals is increasingly being recognized as a threat to groundwater quality. A critical determinant of Cr(VI) generation within soils and sediments is the necessary interaction of two low-solubility phases Cr(III) silicates or (hydr)oxides and Mn(III/IV) oxides that lead to its production. Here we investigate the potential for Cr(III) oxidation by Mn oxides within fixed solid matrices common to soils and sediments. Artificial aggregates were constructed from Cr(OH)(3)(-) and Cr0.25Fe0.75(OH)(3)-coated quartz grains and either mixed with synthetic birnessite or inoculated with the Mn(II)-oxidizing bacterium Leptothrix cholodnii. In aggregates simulating low organic carbon environments, we observe Cr(VI) concentrations within advecting solutes at levels more than twenty-times the California drinking water standard. Chromium(VI) production is highly dependent on Crmineral solubility; increasing Fe-substitution (x = 0 to x = 0.75) decreases the solubility of the solid and concomitantly decreases total Cr(VI) generation by 37%. In environments with high organic carbon, reducing conditions within aggregate cores (microbially) generate sufficient Fe(II) to suppress Cr(VI) efflux. Our results illustrate Cr(VI) generation from reaction with Mn oxides within structured media simulating soils and sediments and provide insight into how fluctuating hydrologic and redox conditions impact coupled processes controlling Cr and Mn cycling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据