4.8 Article

Combined Effect of Weak Magnetic Fields and Anions on Arsenite Sequestration by Zerovalent Iron: Kinetics and Mechanisms

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 51, 期 7, 页码 3742-3750

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b06117

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21522704, 51478329, 51608431, U1532120]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M580824]
  3. Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Environmental Exposure and Health [GZKLEEH201602]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  5. Shaanxi Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016BSHYDZZ45]
  6. Research Project of Shaanxi Education Department [16JS060]
  7. Research Fund of Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology [QN1616]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the effects of major anions (e.g., ClO4-, NO3-, Cl-, and SO42-) in water on the reactivity of zerovalent iron (ZVI) toward As(III) sequestration were evaluated with and without a weak magnetic field (WMF). Without WMF, ClO4- and NO3- had negligible influence on As(III) removal by ZVI, but Cl- and SO42- could improve As(III) sequestration by ZVI. Moreover, the WMF-enhancing effect on As(III) removal by ZVI was minor in ultrapure water. A synergetic effect of WMF and individual anion on improving As(III) removal by ZVI was observed for each of the investigated anion, which became more pronounced as the concentration of anion increased. Based on the extent of enhancing effects, these anions were ranked in the order of SO42- > Cl- > NO3- approximate to ClO4- (from most- to least-enhanced). Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of HSiO3-, HCO3-, and H2PO4- on ZVI corrosion could be alleviated taking advantage effect of the combined WMF and SO42-. The coupled influence of anions and WMF was associated with the simultaneous movement of anions with paramagnetic Fe2+ to keep local electroneutrality in solution. Our findings suggest that the presence of anions is quite essential to maintaining or stimulating the WMF effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据