4.8 Article

Biotransformation of the Flame Retardant 1,2-Dibromo-4-(1,2-dibromoethyl)cyclohexane (TBECH) in Vitro by Human Liver Microsomes

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 51, 期 18, 页码 10511-10518

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b02834

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union Seventh Framework Programme [606857]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The technical mixture of 1,2-dibromo-4-(1,2-dibromoethyl)cyclohexane (TBECH or DBE-DBCH) and the pure beta-TBECH isomer were subjected to in vitro biotransformation by human liver microsomes (HLM). After 60 min of incubation, 5 potential metabolites of TBECH were identified in microsomal assays of both the TBECH mixture and beta-TBECH using ultraperformance liquid chromatography-Q Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometry. These include mono- and dihydroxylated TBECH and mono- and dihydroxylated TriBECH as well as an alpha-oxidation metabolite bromo. (1,2-dibromocyclohexyl)-acetic acid. Our results indicate potential hepatic biotransfonnalion of TBECH via cyctochroine P450-catalyzed hydroxylation, debromination, and alpha-oxidation. Kinetic studies revealed that the formation of monohydroxy-TBECH, dihydroxy-TBECH, and monohydroxy-TriBECH were best fitted to a Michaelis-Menten enzyme kinetic model. Respective estimated V-max values (maximum metabolic rate) for these metabolites were 11.8 +/- 4,0.6 +/- 0.1, and 10.1 +/- 0.8 pmol min(-1) mg protein(-1) in TBECH mixture and 4992 +/- 1340, 14.1 +/- 4.9, and 66.1 +/- 7.3 pmol min' mg protein(-1) in beta-TBECH. This indicates monohydroxy-TBECH as the major metabolite of TBECH by in vitro HLM-based assay. The estimated in vitro intrinsic clearance (Cl-int) of TBECH mixture was slower (P < 0.05) than that of pure beta-TBECH. While the formation of monohydroxy-TBECH may reduce the bioaccumulation potential and provide a useful biomarker for monitoring TBECH exposure, further studies are required to fully understand the levels and toxicological implications of the identified metabolites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据