4.8 Article

Global Proteome Profiling of a Marine Copepod and the Mitigating Effect of Ocean Acidification on Mercury Toxicity after Multigenerational Exposure

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 51, 期 10, 页码 5820-5831

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01832

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41476094]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFA0601203]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China [2017J01081]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previously, we found that ocean acidification (OA) mitigates mercury (Hg) toxicity to marine copepod Tigriopus japonicus under multigenerational exposure (four generations, F0-F3). To determine the response mechanisms of T. japonicus against long-term exposure to OA and Hg pollution, we investigated the proteome of F3 copepods after multigenerational exposure to four conditions: pCO(2) 400 mu atm + control; pCO(2) 1000 mu atm + control; pCO(2) 400 mu atm +1.0 mu g/L Hg; and pCO(2) 1000 mu atm +1.0,ug/L Hg. Functional enrichment analysis indicated that OA enhanced the copepod's energy production mainly by increasing protein assimilation and proteolysis as a compensatory strategy, which explained its physiological resilience to reduced pH. Conversely, Hg treatment decreased many critical processes, including ferric iron binding, antioxidant activity, cellular homeostasis, and glutathione metabolism, and these toxic events could translate into higher-level responses, i.e., restrained reproduction in copepods. Importantly, the mediation of Hg toxicity in T. japonicus by OA could be explained by the enhanced lysosome-autophagy pathway proteomes that are responsible for repairing and removing damaged proteins and enzymes under stress. Overall, this study provided molecular insights into the response of T. japonicus to long-term exposure of OA and Hg, with a particular emphasis on the mitigating impact of the CO2-driven acidification on Hg toxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据