4.8 Article

Group Contribution Approach To Predict the Refractive Index of Pure Organic Components in Ambient Organic Aerosol

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 51, 期 17, 页码 9683-9690

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01756

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/L006901/1]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21473009, 91544223]
  3. China Scholarship Council
  4. NERC [NE/L006901/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1627990] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/L006901/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We introduce and assess a group contribution scheme by which the refractive index (RI) (lambda = 589 nm) of nonabsorbing components common to secondary organic aerosols can be predicted from the molecular formula and chemical functionality. The group contribution method is based on representative values of ratios of the molecular polarizability and molar volume of different functional groups derived from data for a training set of 234 compounds. The training set consists of 106 nonaromatic compounds common to atmospheric aerosols, 64 aromatic compounds, and 64 compounds containing halogens; a separate group contribution model is provided for each of these three classes of compound. The :resulting predictive model reproduces the RIs of compounds in the training set with mean. errors of +/- 0.58, +/- 0.36, and. +/- 0.30% for the nonaromatic, aromatic, and halogen, containing compounds, respectively. We then evaluate predictions from the group contribution model for compounds with no previously reported RI, comparing values with predictions from previous treatments and with measurements from single aerosol particle experiments. We illustrate how such comparisons can be used, to further refine the predictive model. We suggest that the accuracy of this model is already sufficient to better constrain the optical properties of organic aerosol of known composition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据