4.8 Article

Highly Elevated Levels and Particle-Size Distributions of Environmentally Persistent Free Radicals in Haze-Associated Atmosphere

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 51, 期 14, 页码 7936-7944

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01929

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91543108, 21361140359]
  2. Chinese National 973 Program [2015CB453100]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB14020102]
  4. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [2016038]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Levels and particle-size distributions of environmentally persistent free radicals (EPFRs) in haze-associated atmospheric particulate matter (PM) have not been highlighted, even though they may enter the human body along with PM and adversely affect human health. This study quantified the levels of EPFRs in airborne PM with different aerodynamic diameters (d(ae)) using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. EPR spectra showed a single, unstructured signal from persistent semiquinone radicals. The average concentration of EPFRs in the airborne PM during haze events was 2.18 x 12(20) spins/g (range: 3.06 x 10(19)-6.23 X 10(20) spins/g), approximately 2 orders of magnitude higher than that reported previously in the US atmosphere. Particle-size distributions of EPFRs in four different PM fractions (d(ae) > 10 mu m, 10 mu m < d(ae) < 2.5 mu m, 2.5 mu m < 1 mu m, d(ae) < 1 mu m) indicated the highest levels of EPFRs in the PM fraction with d(ae) < 1 mu m, with average 1/e lifetime of 59.2 days. A significant occurrence of EPFRs in PM samples collected from coal-burning activities (1.52 x 10(22) spins/g), automobile exhaust (3.0 X 10(22) spins/g), and biomass burning activities (1.14 X 10(22) spins/g) was detected, which may be potential primary sources of EPFRs in airborne PM. The results in this study may help to understand the sources and potential risks of EPFRs in airborne fine particles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据