4.6 Article

Waste sludge disintegration, methanogenesis and final disposal via various pretreatments: Comparison of performance and effectiveness

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ese.2021.100132

关键词

Sludge disintegration; Anaerobic sludge digestion; Effectiveness comparison; Different pretreatments

资金

  1. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment (Harbin Institute of Technology) [2019TS04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study compared three wastewater pretreatments and found that different pretreatments have their own advantages and disadvantages in the treatment and disposal of sludge. The selection of pretreatment can be based on specific objectives to achieve optimal results.
This study compared the three wastewater pretreatments of ozonation, Fe2+-S2O82- and freeze-thawing (F/T) in the disintegration, anaerobic digestion (AD) and final disposal of the sludge. The F/T pretreatment increased the dewaterability and settleability of the sludge by 7.8% and 47.1%, respectively. The ozonation pretreatment formed more volatile fatty acids (VFAs), with a peak value of 320.82 mg SCOD/L and controlled the release of sulfides. The Fe2+-S(2)O(8)(2-)pretreatment removed heavy metals through the absorption and flocculation of ferric particles formed in-situ. During the anaerobic digestion of the sludge, the ozonation pretreatment accelerated the hydrolysis rate (k) rather than the biochemical methane potential (B-0) of the sludge due to the high VFA content in the supernatant. Comparatively, the F/T pretreatment facilitated the B0 with great economic efficiency by enhancing the solubilisation of the sludge. Although Fe2+-S2O82- pretreatment decreased the methane production, the ferric particle was a unique advantage in the disintegration and harmless disposal of the sludge. The digested sludge had more VFAs after ozonation pretreatment, which contributed to the recycling of carbon. In addition, the lower sludge volume could save the expense of transportation and disposal by ozonation pretreatment. Different pretreatments had different characteristics. The comparative study provided information allowing the selection of the type of pretreatment to achieve different objectives of the treatment and disposal of sludge. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据