4.3 Review

Structural Proteomics: Detection of Neurodegenerative Protein Modifica-tions

期刊

CURRENT PROTEIN & PEPTIDE SCIENCE
卷 22, 期 9, 页码 641-655

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1389203722666211029101002

关键词

Cross-linking mass spectrometry; neurodegenerative diseases; neuroproteomics; hydrogen deuterium trade mass spectrometry; cerebrospinal fluid; brain tissue sample

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research on neurodegenerative diseases has highlighted the importance of discovering biomarkers for accurate and reproducible diagnosis and prognosis. Evolving proteomic technologies, such as Mass Spectrometry, offer new avenues for rapidly identifying biomarkers, but further investigation is needed to explore the complexities of the brain and its disorders.
For decades now, neurodegenerative disorders have been explored, but their prompt detection is still very strenuous due to the complexity of the brain. This entails the demand for identification and development of clinical biomarkers in order to comply with the criteria of precision, specificity and repeatability. The use of rapidly evolving technologies such as Mass Spectrometry (MS) in proteomics has opened new ways to speed up the discovery of biomarkers, both for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. The wide range of possibilities for the detection of differentially expressed proteins in specific diseases has been opened by several novel proteomic techniques such as cross-linking mass spectrometry, hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry, protein foot printing and more. Still, much research is required to give a deep insight into the complex system of the brain and its related disorders for unraveling prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers, which can be used to either enhance a certain function of our brain or to cure a particular disease/disorder. This review summarizes the latest developments in neuroproteomics and analyzes existing and potential directions for the discovery of biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据