4.0 Article

Synthetic alkaline-earth hydroxyapatites: Influence of their structural, textural, and morphological properties over Co2+ ion adsorption capacity

期刊

MATERIALS SCIENCE-POLAND
卷 39, 期 2, 页码 252-264

出版社

SCIENDO
DOI: 10.2478/msp-2021-0022

关键词

barium hydroxyapatite; strontium hydroxyapatite; calcium hydroxyapatite; chemical precipitation synthesis; Co2+ ion adsorption

资金

  1. Department of Chemistry at ININ, Mexico [CB-007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study synthesized nanocrystalline barium, strontium, and calcium hydroxyapatites, showing better nanocrystallinity, structural stability, and adsorption capacity. The physicochemical properties of these materials were directly correlated with their adsorption capacity for Co2+ ions.
This work addresses the synthesis of nanocrystalline barium, strontium, and calcium hydroxyapatites (Ca-HAps) via the chemical precipitation method, followed by calcination. To give a coherent picture of the most important structural, textural, and morphological properties of these materials and to investigate the influence of these characteristics over Co2+ ion adsorption capacity from aqueous solutions, the powders prepared were systematically characterized by X-ray diffraction, N-2-physisorption measurements, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry, and Fourier Transformed Infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The results clearly showed that the Ca-HAp obtained exhibits better nanocrystallinity, greater structural stability, high surface area, high total pore volume, and mesoporosity, compared with the other synthesized hydroxyapatites, and that these physicochemical properties share a direct correlation with favorable Co2+ ion adsorption capacity at room temperature and pressure. The results proved that the physicochemical features of resulting alkaline-earth hydroxyapatites, prepared via the chemical precipitation method, played a fundamental role during the adsorption of heavy metal (with high toxicity) from aqueous solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据