4.7 Article

An experience of personalized learning hub initiative embedding BYOD for reflective engagement in higher education

期刊

COMPUTERS & EDUCATION
卷 88, 期 -, 页码 227-240

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.06.003

关键词

BYOD; Flipped classroom; Higher education; Personalized learning hub; Reflective engagement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article shares an experience in the implementation of the personalized learning hub initiative embedding Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) on learners' reflective engagement in flipped classrooms at a higher education institute. A reflective engagement framework was developed, consisting of three dimensions: intellectual, personal and social reflective engagement. Participants involved 26 in-service teachers for a teacher professional development programme on e-Learning. Participants were encouraged to bring and use their own portable computing devices as a personalized learning hub to support their reflective engagement. The analysis of qualitative and quantitative data collected provides evidence on learners' attainment of reflective engagement in the three dimensions. The designed initiative enabled learners to achieve a significant knowledge gain for enhancing their understanding of e-Learning. The learners perceived that the initiative could help achieving their learning outcomes. They also perceived that group interaction and experience sharing with peers, teachers and related experts in this context could help advance their knowledge. These results imply that the designed initiative can promote learners to be engaged in reflective inquiry for deep learning and personal growth. Directions of future work are discussed regarding validating the developed framework through extending the use of the reflective engagement framework and the personalized learning hub initiative embedding BYOD to more learning scenarios, and enhancing the related teacher professional development. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据