4.7 Article

The presence of MWCNTs reduces developmental toxicity of PFOS in early life stage of zebrafish

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 222, 期 -, 页码 201-209

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.12.055

关键词

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs); Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS); Developmental toxicity; Zebrafish embryo and larvae; Oxidative stress; Lipid peroxidation (LPO)

资金

  1. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry, China
  2. Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment of Harbin institute of technology, China [ES201608]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Both carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) are used widely. There is considerable concern regarding their ecotoxicity. CNTs might interact with PFOS in water and result in different impacts compared with those after single exposures. To our knowledge, the developmental toxicity of PFOS in the presence of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) in the early life stage of zebrafish (from 3 h post fertilization (hpf) to 96 hpf) was investigated for the first time in this study. The embryos and larvae were exposed to PFOS (0.2, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.6 mg/L), MWCNTs (50 mg/L), and a mixture of both. Compared with PFOS exposure, the adverse effects induced by PFOS on the hatching rate of zebrafish embryos and the heart rate and body length of zebrafish larvae were reduced in the presence of MWCNTs, and mortality and malformation were also alleviated. In addition, zebrafish larvae exposed to PFOS showed decreased activities of superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase, as well as decreased levels of reactive oxygen species and malondialdehyde, in the presence of MWCNTs, indicating that oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation was relieved. Thus, the presence of MWCNTs reduces the developmental toxicity of PFOS in the early life stage of zebrafish. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据