4.5 Article

Aurantiochytrium sp. Meal Improved Body Fatty Acid Profile and Morphophysiology in Nile Tilapia Reared at Low Temperature

期刊

FISHES
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/fishes6040045

关键词

Aurantiochytrium sp; docosahexaenoic acid; histology; Oreochromis niloticus; physiology; temperature

资金

  1. Alltech Inc. (USA)
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPESBrazil) [001]
  3. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPqBrazil) [313185/2020-4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research found that the addition of Aurantiochytrium sp. meal can increase the fatty acid content, especially DHA, in Nile tilapia, promoting improvements in intestinal and hepatopancreatic morphophysiology.
Aurantiochytrium sp. is a heterotrophic microorganism that produces docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), thus being considered as a possible replacement for fish oil in aquafeeds. We investigated the effect of Aurantiochytrium sp. meal (AM) dietary levels (0, 5, 10, 20, and 40 g kg(-1)) on Nile tilapia body and hepatopancreas fatty acid (FA) profile, body FA retention, somatic indices, and morphophysiological changes in the intestine and hepatopancreas, after feeding Nile tilapia juveniles (average initial weight 8.47 g) for 87 days at 22 degrees C. The 10AM diet was compared to a control diet containing cod liver oil (CLO), since their DHA concentration was similar. Within fish fed diets containing increasing levels of AM, there was a linear increase in n-3 FA content, especially DHA, which varied in the body (0.02 to 0.41 g 100 g(-1)) and hepatopancreas (0.15 to 1.05 g 100 g(-1)). The morphology of the intestines and hepatopancreas was positively affected in AM-fed fish. Fish fed 10AM showed less accumulation of n-3 FAs in the body and hepatopancreas when compared to fish fed CLO. Therefore, AM is an adequate substitute for fish oil in winter diets for Nile tilapia, with the supplementation of 40AM promoting the best results regarding intestine and hepatopancreas morphophysiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据