4.7 Article

Effects of biochar on reducing the abundance of oxytetracycline, antibiotic resistance genes, and human pathogenic bacteria in soil and lettuce

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 224, 期 -, 页码 787-795

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.01.021

关键词

Antibiotic resistance gene; Biochar; Human pathogenic bacteria; intl1; Oxytetracycline

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [41671474, 41601531]
  2. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest [201303094]
  3. 948 Project of Chinese Ministry of Agriculture [2015-Z37]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in soil can affect human health via the food chain. Biochar is a soil amendment but its impacts on ARGs and the microbial communities associated with soil and vegetables are unclear. Therefore, we established three lettuce pot culture experiments, i.e., 0300: 300 mg/kg oxytetracycline (OTC), BO300: 300 mg/kg OTC + 2% biochar, and a control without OTC or biochar. We found that under BO300, the relative abundances of ARGs were reduced by 51.8%, 43.4%, and 44.1% in lettuce leaves, roots, and soil, respectively, compared with 0300. intl1 was highly abundant in soil and lettuce, and it co-occurred with some ARGs (tetW, ermF, and sul1. Redundancy analysis and network analysis indicated that the bacterial community succession was the main mechanism that affected the variations in ARGs and intl1. The reduction of Firmicutes due to the biochar treatment of soil and lettuce was the main factor responsible for the removal of tetracycline resistance genes in leaves. Biochar application led to the disappearance of human pathogenic bacteria (HPB), which was significantly correlated with the abundances of ermF and ermX. In summary, biochar is an effective farmland amendment for reducing the abundances of antibiotics, ARGs, and HPB in order to ensure the safety of vegetables and protect human health. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据