4.7 Article

Tough and Resilient Hydrogels Enabled by a Multifunctional Initiating and Cross-Linking Agent

期刊

GELS
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/gels7040177

关键词

hydrogels; toughness; resilience; entanglements; branched chains

资金

  1. State Key Scientific Special Project of China [2016ZX05011-003-002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51673120]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By introducing both PA and MBA into polyacrylamide hydrogel networks, a entangled network with chemically cross-linked chains and branched chains was constructed, resulting in hydrogels with both high toughness and high resilience.
Many high-strength hydrogels have been developed in recent years; however, few of them are both tough and resilient, and their intrinsic paradoxical nature makes designing a gel with both high toughness and high resilience a great challenge. To address this problem, we introduced both N,N,N,N-pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PA) and N,N-methylenebisacrylamide (MBA) into polyacrylamide hydrogel networks to construct an entangled network that contains chemically cross-linked chains and branched chains simultaneously. The entanglements of branched chains can act as a physical cross-linking point to uniformly disperse stress on molecular chains, and chemical cross-linking ensures the stability of the hydrogel network. The increase in the number and length of branched chains is able to achieve an enhancement in strength while the slip of the entangled polymer chains can effectively achieve energy dissipation and can improve the toughness of the gel. Moreover, the resultant hydrogels exhibit an excellent resilience (>98%). Therefore, high toughness and resilience are achieved simultaneously. In addition, we also investigated the initiation mechanism of PA. This strategy creates a new way for the preparation of next-generation high toughness and high resilience hydrogel-based materials, which have promising applications in wearable, flexible strain/pressure sensors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据