4.7 Review

Review of contamination of sewage sludge and amended soils by polybrominated diphenyl ethers based on meta-analysis

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 220, 期 -, 页码 753-765

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.10.053

关键词

PBDEs; Sewage sludge; Sludge-amended soil

资金

  1. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [2016R1A1A3A04005415]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [RGPIN 185040-13, RGPIN 7111-11]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016R1A1A3A04005415] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) are still present in sewage sludge and sludge-amended soil, even though commercial PBDEs were prohibited or voluntarily phased out several years ago. In this study, levels and compositional profiles of seven major PBDE congeners in sludge are assessed in relation to their usage patterns in commercial products, and years of being banned and phased out in North America, Europe, and Asia. Annual accumulations and future long-term changes of PBDE in sludge amended soil are estimated. BDE-209 has the highest concentration, followed by BDE-99 and BDE-47. The highest concentrations, up to 23,500 ng g(-1), of PBDEs in sludge were found in North America until 2004-2007, whereas since then sludge PBDE concentrations, up to 6600 ng g(-1) have been higher in Asia than on the other two continents. The amount of sludge applied and the soil organic matter content play important roles in determining PBDE concentrations in sludge-amended soil. The estimated concentrations of BDE-47, -99, and -209 in soils receiving sludge applications during the past 15 years are 40 300 times higher than in soils after the initial sludge application. The accumulated concentrations of BDE-47 and BDE-99 are expected to decrease by 99% between 2016 and 2100, whereas the decrease in the BDE-209 concentration is predicted to be approximately 87%. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据