4.7 Article

Three-dimensional investigation of ozone pollution in the lower troposphere using an unmanned aerial vehicle platform

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 224, 期 -, 页码 107-116

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.01.064

关键词

Drone; Tropospheric ozone; Vertical profiling; Ozone horizontal variation

资金

  1. Shanghai Environmental Protection Bureau [2014-8]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China, China [2016YFCO200500]
  3. 2B Technologies, Inc

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Potential utilities of instrumented lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to quickly characterize tropospheric ozone pollution and meteorological factors including air temperature and relative humidity at three-dimensional scales are highlighted in this study. Both vertical and horizontal variations of ozone within the 1000 m lower troposphere at a local area of 4 x 4 km(2) are investigated during summer and autumn times. Results from field measurements show that the UAV platform has a sufficient reliability and precision in capturing spatiotemporal variations of ozone and meteorological factors. The results also reveal that ozone vertical variation is mainly linked to the vertical distribution patterns of air temperature and the horizontal transport of air masses from other regions. In addition, significant horizontal variations of ozone are also observed at different levels. Without major exhaust sources, ozone horizontal variation has a strong correlation with the vertical convection intensity of air masses within the lower troposphere. Higher air temperatures are usually related to lower ozone horizontal variations at the localized area, whereas underlying surface diversity has a week influence. Three-dimensional ozone maps are obtained using an interpolation method based on UAV collected samples, which are capable of clearly demonstrating the diurnal evolution processes of ozone within the 1000 m lower troposphere. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据