4.3 Article

Europium-Doped Y2O3-Coated Diatomite Nanomaterials: Hydrothermal Synthesis, Characterization, Optical Study with Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance

期刊

INORGANICS
卷 9, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/inorganics9120088

关键词

sono-photocatalytic degradation; europium; diatomite; luminescent; reactive blue 19

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2019R1A5A8080290]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Eu-doped Y2O3 coated diatomite nanostructures were synthesized by a hydrothermal method with variable Eu3+ contents, and characterized by various techniques. The substitution of Eu3+ ions into Y2O3 lattice caused a redshift in absorbance and a decrease in bandgap, while increasing pore volume and BET specific surface area of the coated compounds. The sonophotocatalytic activities of the synthesized specimens for dye degradation were explored with different specifications such as ultrasonic power, catalyst amount, and dye concentration.
Eu-doped Y2O3 coated diatomite nanostructures with variable Eu3+ contents were synthesized by a facile hydrothermal technique. The products were characterized by means of energy dispersive X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (EDX), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET), UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, and photoluminescence spectroscopy techniques. As claimed by PXRD, the particles were crystallized excellently and attributed to the cubic phase of Y2O3. The influence of substitution of Eu3+ ions into Y2O3 lattice caused a redshift in the absorbance and a decrease in the bandgap of as-prepared coated compounds. The pore volume and BET specific surface area of Eu-doped Y2O3-coated diatomite is greater than uncoated biosilica. The sonophotocata-lytic activities of as-synthesized specimens were evaluated for the degradation of Reactive Blue 19. The effect of various specifications such as ultrasonic power, catalyst amount, and primary dye concentration was explored.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据