4.7 Article

Below-cloud wet scavenging of soluble inorganic ions by rain in Beijing during the summer of 2014

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 230, 期 -, 页码 963-973

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.033

关键词

Below-cloud scavenging; Wet scavenging coefficient; Inorganic aerosols; Precipitation chemistry; Wet deposition

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB05030203]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41225019, 41305113, 41575123]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wet deposition is one of the most important and efficient removal mechanisms in the reduction of air pollution. As a key parameter determining wet deposition, the wet scavenging coefficient (WSC) is widely used in chemical transport models (CTMs) and reported values have large uncertainties. In this study, a high-resolution observational dataset of the soluble inorganic aerosols (SO42-, NO3- and NH4+, hereafter SNA) in the air and in rainwater during multiple precipitation events was collected using sequential sampling and used to estimate the below-cloud WSC in Beijing during the summer of 2014. The average concentrations of SNA in precipitation during the observational period were 7.9 mg/L, 6.2 mg/L and 4.6 mg/L, with the contributions from below-cloud scavenging constituting 56%, 61% and 47% of this, respectively. The scavenging ratios of SNA (i.e., the ratio of the concentrations in rain to concentrations in the air) were used with the height of the cloud base and the precipitation intensity to estimate the WSC. The estimated WSC of SO42- is comparable to that reported elsewhere. The relationship between the below-cloud WSC and the precipitation intensity followed an exponential power distribution (K = aP(b)) for SNA. In contrast to previous studies, this study considers the differences between the chemical compositions of the SNA, with the highest WSC for NO3-, followed by those of SO42- and NH4+. Therefore, we recommend that CTMs include ion specific WSCs in the future. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据