4.1 Article

Inkjet printed CuIn(1-X)GaXSe2 thin film by controlled selenium distribution for improved power conversion efficiency in chalcopyrite solar cells

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsadv.2021.100144

关键词

CIGS; Inkjet printing; Se vapor; Graphite box geometry; Fine-grained layer

资金

  1. ARCI-Technology Research Center (TRC) through Department of Science and Technology (DST), India [Al/1/65/ARCI/2014(c)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the effect of Se vapor distribution on grain growth of inkjet printed precursor film using different geometries of graphite boxes. Results showed that selenization in a round graphite box led to uniform surface coverage and suppressed fine-grained layer, while selenization in a square graphite box exhibited negative impacts such as high strain and low crystallinity.
Selenium (Se) vapor pressure is a key factor during the selenization of CuIn1-XGaX (CIG) film to obtain a highquality CuIn1-XGaXSe2 (CIGS) absorber layer. To investigate the effect of Se vapor distribution on the grain growth of inkjet printed precursor film, two geometries of graphite box (square and circular) are used. The results revealed that selenization in the round graphite box give rise to uniform surface coverage and suppressed finegrained layer due to adequate and uniform distribution of Se vapor. In contrast, film selenized in a square graphite box exhibits high strain and low crystallinity with a thick fine-grained layer. Probable Se vapor distribution inside the graphite box based on internal geometrical constraint and its impact on crystal phase and microstructure is discussed. Finally, CIGS devices fabricated using films selenized in a round graphite box demonstrates higher power-conversion efficiency of 5.2%, owing to high light absorption and efficient carrier separation. Based on J-V and EQE results, probable losses and recombination in the devices are examined and discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据