4.6 Article

Genome characteristics and environmental distribution of the first phage that infects the LD28 clade, afreshwater methylotrophic bacterial group

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 19, 期 11, 页码 4714-4727

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.13936

关键词

-

资金

  1. Mid-Career Research Program through the National Research Foundation (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [NRF-2016R1A2B2015142]
  2. Collaborative Genome Program - Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Korea [20140428]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacteriophages infecting major groups of freshwater heterotrophic bacteria have been rarely isolated, hampering analyses of freshwater viromes. Here, we report the isolation and genomic characterization of P19250A, the first phage that infects the LD28 clade, an abundant freshwater methylotrophic bacterial group. P19250A was isolated from Lake Soyang, an oligotrophic reservoir, using an LD28 strain as a host. Morphological and genomic analyses revealed that P19250A is a lytic siphovirus with a approximate to 38.6-kb genome. To analyze the distribution of P19250A genome within its habitat, six seasonal viral metagenome (virome) samples were prepared from Lake Soyang. Through binning analysis of freshwater viromes, P19250A was shown to be the most highly assigned freshwater phage that infects heterotrophic bacteria (up to 8.21%) in five viromes. Furthermore, when freshwater virome data collected worldwide were analyzed, P19250A genome also showed high abundance, especially in Lough Neagh, UK, where P19250A genome was recorded as the most abundant bacteriophage. From metagenome analysis, the proportion of P19250A-assigned reads showed seasonal fluctuation following the abundance of the LD28 clade in Lake Soyang. These results showed that P19250A would be an essential resource for analyses of freshwater viromes, and also suggest that phages of other abundant freshwater bacteria need to be isolated for better understanding of freshwater viruses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据