4.6 Article

One-year calorie restriction impacts gut microbial composition but not its metabolic performance in obese adolescents

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 1536-1551

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.13713

关键词

-

资金

  1. Carlos III Institute of Health [PI 051579, PI021513]
  2. Economy, Industry and Competitiveness Ministry [AGL-11697/ALI]
  3. FPU from the Spanish Ministery of Economy and Competitivity
  4. FPI from the Spanish Ministery of Economy and Competitivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent evidence has disclosed a connection between gut microbial glycosidase activity and adiposity in obese. Here, we measured microbial -glucosidase and -galactosidase activities and sorted fluorescently labeled -galactosidase containing (GAL) microorganisms in faecal samples of eight lean andthirteen obese adolescents that followed a controlled calorie restriction program during one year. -galactosidase is a highly distributed functional trait, mainly expressed by members of Blautia, Bacteroides, Alcaligenes, Acinetobacter and Propionibacterium. Only long-term calorie restriction induced clear changes in the microbiota of obese adolescents. Long-term calorie restriction induced significant shifts in total and GAL gut microbiota, reducing the Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratio and enhancing the growth of beneficial microorganisms such as Bacteroides, Roseburia, Faecalibacterium and Clostridium XIVa. Moreover, the structure and composition of GAL community in obese after long-term calorie restriction was highly similar to that of lean adolescents. However, despite this high compositional similarity, microbial metabolic performance was different, split in two metabolic states at a body mass index value of 25. Our study shows that calorie restriction is a strong environmental force reshaping gut microbiota though its metabolic performance is linked to host's adiposity, suggesting that functional redundancy and metabolic plasticity are fundamental properties of gut microbial ecosystem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据