4.6 Article

Optical study of the electronic structure of locally noncentrosymmetric CeRh2As2

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 104, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.245116

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [20H04453]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20H04453] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electronic structures of heavy-fermion superconductor CeRh2As2 and reference material LaRh2As2 were investigated using experimental optical conductivity spectra and first-principles density functional theory calculations. In CeRh2As2, two mid-IR peaks corresponding to the unoccupied Ce 4f(5/2) and 4f(7/2) states were strongly developed with decreasing temperature, suggesting the emergence of hybridization states between conduction and 4f electrons.
The electronic structures of the heavy-fermion superconductor CeRh2As2 with local inversion symmetry breaking and the reference material LaRh2As2 have been investigated by using experimental optical conductivity [sigma(1)(omega)] spectra and first-principles density functional theory calculations. The low-temperature sigma(1)(omega) spectra of LaRh2As2 revealed a broad peak at similar to 0.1 eV and a sharp peak at similar to 0.5 eV after a subtraction of the Drude contribution of free carriers. The peak features and the background intensity were nicely reproduced in calculated sigma(1)(omega) spectra from DFT calculations, implying a conventional metallic nature. In CeRh2As2, two mid-IR peaks at (h) over bar omega similar to 0.12 and 0.4 eV corresponding to the unoccupied Ce 4f(5/2) and 4f(7/2) states, respectively, were strongly developed with decreasing temperature, which suggests the emergence of hybridization states between the conduction and 4f electrons. We compared the temperature dependence of the mid-IR peaks of CeRh2As2 with corresponding data from CeCu(2)Si(2 )and CeNi2Ge2 in a ThCr2Si2-type structure to examine the possible impact of local inversion symmetry breaking on electronic structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据