3.8 Article

A Family of Externally-Functionalised Coordination Cages

期刊

CHEMISTRY-SWITZERLAND
卷 3, 期 4, 页码 1203-1214

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/chemistry3040088

关键词

coordination cage; crystal structure; host-guest chemistry

资金

  1. Leverhulme Trust [RPG-2019-149]
  2. European Union [765297]
  3. EPSRC [EP/R03382X/1]
  4. University ofWarwick
  5. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [765297] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)
  6. EPSRC [EP/R03382X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New synthetic routes are used to introduce various substituents into a M8L12 cubic coordination cage, allowing the formation of functionalized cage cores with metal ions. This allows for a diverse range of synthetic opportunities and increased solubility of the cages.
New synthetic routes are presented to derivatives of a (known) M8L12 cubic coordination cage in which a range of different substituents are attached at the C-4 position of the pyridyl rings at either end of the bis(pyrazolyl-pyridine) bridging ligands. The substituents are (i) -CN groups (new ligand L-CN), (ii) -CH2OCH2-CCH (containing a terminal alkyne) groups (new ligand L(C)); and (iii) -(CH2OCH2)(3)CH2OMe (tri-ethyleneglycol monomethyl ether) groups (new ligand L-PEG). The resulting functionalised ligands combine with M2+ ions (particularly Co2+, Ni2+, Cd2+) to give isostructural [M8L12](16+) cage cores bearing 24 external functional groups; the cages based on L-CN (with M2+ = Cd2+) and L(C) (with M2+ = Ni2+) have been crystallographically characterised. The value of these is twofold: (i) exterior nitrile or alkene substituents can provide a basis for further synthetic opportunities via 'Click' reactions allowing in principle a diverse range of functionalisation of the cage exterior surface; (ii) the exterior -(CH2OCH2)(3)CH2OMe groups substantially increase cage solubility in both water and in organic solvents, allowing binding constants of cavity-binding guests to be measured under an increased range of conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据