4.7 Article

Antibiotics for Fever Among Children: Findings From the Surveillance for Enteric Fever in India Cohorts

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 224, 期 -, 页码 S494-S501

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiab115

关键词

antibiotic treatment; acute febrile illness; pediatric; cohort; India; SEFI

资金

  1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [INV -009497-OPP1159351]
  2. Fogarty International Center,National Institutes of Health, USA [D43 TW007392]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found a high rate of inappropriate antibiotic use for fever in children in India, highlighting the potential risk of antimicrobial resistance due to frequent and inappropriate use of antibiotics.
Background. Acute febrile illness in children is frequently treated with antibiotics. However, the inappropriate use of antibiotics has led to the emergence of multidrug-resistant pathogens. Methods. We measured use of antibiotics for fever in 4 pediatric cohorts that were part of the Surveillance for Enteric Fever in India (SEI ) network. In this network, 24 062 children were followed up weekly, capturing information on fever and other morbidity between October 2017 and December 2019. Results. An antibiotic was given in 27 183 of the 76 027 (35.8%) episodes of fever. The incidence of fever-related antibiotic use was 58.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 57.2-58.6) per 100 child-years. The median time to initiation of antibiotics was 4 days, and in 65% of those who received an antibiotic it was initiated by the second day. Antibiotics were continued for <3 days in 24% of the episodes. Higher temperature, younger age, male sex, joint family, higher education, internet access, and availability of personal conveyance were associated with antibiotic treatment for fever. Conclusions. In developing countries where antibiotic use is not regulated, broad-spectrum antibiotics are initiated early, and often inappropriately, in febrile illness. Frequent and inappropriate use of antibiotics may increase risk of antimicrobial resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据