3.8 Article

The 2020 research pandemic: A bibliometric analysis of publications on COVID-19 and their scientific impact during the first months

期刊

ARCHIVOS DE CARDIOLOGIA DE MEXICO
卷 91, 期 -, 页码 1-11

出版社

INST NACIONAL CARDIOLOGIA IGNACIO CHAVEZ
DOI: 10.24875/ACM.20000370

关键词

COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Coronavirus; Pandemic; Bibliometrics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through bibliometric analysis of early scientific publications on COVID-19, it was found that the number of publications was significantly correlated with confirmed cases and deaths in each country. This highlights the rapid response of the scientific community in the fight against COVID-19.
Background: The outbreak of COVID-19 has created a landslide of publications, from different sources and unequal impact. We considered that the first 3 months are crucial to understand how knowledge has been generated by performing a bibliometric analysis, including the citations to these articles to guide researchers in exploring this field, and to evaluate the relationship between confirmed COVID-19 cases and deaths with the number of papers per country. Methods: Scientific publications were obtained from PubMed (January-March 2020) and their citations during the first 6 months retrieved from the Scopus database. An analysis of the number of papers by country, approach (type and category of publication), and impact was made. A multiple linear regression model was implemented to analyze the correlation between the number of publications and confirmed cases and deaths. Results: A total of 2,530 publications were analyzed with 59,104 citations (23.4 citations/article), written by authors from 67 countries. China was the country with more publications (988, 39%) and more citations (36,416, 63%) followed by the United States with 423 articles (16.7%) and 7,458 citations (12.6%). The coauthorship network identified 10,756 authors. According to the multivariate analysis, both confirmed cases and deaths were significantly correlated with the number of publications per country (corrected by population size and gross domestic product). Conclusion: The correlation with the number of publications suggests that cases and deaths had some impact on the medical literature, reflecting how rapidly the scientific community has been on the frontline in the fight against COVID-19.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据