4.0 Article

PHROG: families of prokaryotic virus proteins clustered using remote homology

期刊

NAR GENOMICS AND BIOINFORMATICS
卷 3, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nargab/lqab067

关键词

-

资金

  1. H2020 European Research Council [685778]
  2. Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Viruses exhibit high diversity, and the PHROG library, generated using a new clustering approach, proves to be a valuable tool in annotating and understanding the diversity of viral genomes. This will aid the scientific community in exploring the evolution and ecology of viruses.
Viruses are abundant, diverse and ancestral biological entities. Their diversity is high, both in terms of the number of different protein families encountered and in the sequence heterogeneity of each protein family. The recent increase in sequenced viral genomes constitutes a great opportunity to gain new insights into this diversity and consequently urges the development of annotation resources to help functional and comparative analysis. Here, we introduce PHROG (Prokaryotic Virus Remote Homologous Groups), a library of viral protein families generated using a new clustering approach based on remote homology detection by HMM profile-profile comparisons. Considering 17 473 reference (pro)viruses of prokaryotes, 868 340 of the total 938 864 proteins were grouped into 38 880 clusters that proved to be a 2-fold deeper clustering than using a classical strategy based on BLAST-like similarity searches, and yet to remain homogeneous. Manual inspection of similarities to various reference sequence databases led to the annotation of 5108 clusters (containing 50.6 % of the total protein dataset) with 705 different annotation terms, included in 9 functional categories, specifically designed for viruses. Hopefully, PHROG will be a useful tool to better annotate future prokaryotic viral sequences thus helping the scientific community to better understand the evolution and ecology of these entities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据