4.2 Article

Dip-and-Fold Device: A Paper-Based Testing Platform for Rapid Assessment of Insecticides in Water Samples

期刊

ACS APPLIED BIO MATERIALS
卷 4, 期 12, 页码 8456-8465

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.1c00986

关键词

paper-based devices; acetylcholinesterase inhibition; colorimetric detection; pesticides; carbamates; organophosphates

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces a paper-based testing device for the rapid detection of insecticides in water samples, which does not require the introduction of reagents or samples. Experimental results show that the device can satisfactorily detect insecticides of different concentrations within 10 minutes, offering a promising alternative for low-cost and efficient water monitoring and management solutions.
The contamination of water and food in agricultural areas, where an enormous volume of pesticides is widely employed to enhance crop production, is a challenging reality. The rapid assessment of these contaminants is fundamental to assure water and food quality and safety, particularly for local community members. This work presents a nonexpensive and easy-operational paper-based testing device for the fast detection of insecticides (carbamates and organophosphates) in water samples. The structural design dip-and-fold allows us to carry out the analysis without introducing reagents or samples. The device is prepared using different high-quality papers to support the active acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and the customized chemical formulation for colorimetric detection. The chemical principle is based on the AChE inhibition reaction and Ellman's method. The experiments using standard solutions of carbofuran, propoxur, and chlorpyriphos indicated satisfactory detection at concentrations between 0.1 and 0.0001 mM, and the color results are revealed within 10 min. Therefore, this technique represents a promising alternative for implementing low-cost and efficient water monitoring and management solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据