4.1 Article

Dependence of Asian honeybee on deciduous woody plants for pollen resource during spring to mid-summer in northern Japan

期刊

ENTOMOLOGICAL SCIENCE
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 96-99

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ens.12228

关键词

Apidae; Apis cerana japonica; deciduous forest; foraging habitat; Hymenoptera; landscape mosaic; pollination service

资金

  1. JSPS Fellows [15J07621]
  2. JSPS' KAKENHI [26292181]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26292181, 15J07621] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Apis cerana japonica Radoszkowski, endemic to Japan, is known to be one of the most important pollinators for wild plants and crops, such as buckwheat, in cool to warm temperate Japan. To determine the degree of dependence of A. cerana japonica on forest resources, we analyzed pollen brought back to nests in a typical Satoyama landscape with relatively high deciduous forest coverage in northern Japan. We divided the landscape elements of the study area into three types: deciduous forest, conifer plantation and open land according to landcover digital data, and each pollen taxon was assigned to one of these three types of landscape elements. We collected total pollen loads of 15.75 g (total of colonies A and B) in May (spring), 1.57g ( total of colonies A and C) in June (early summer), 19.03 g (total of colonies A, B and C) in July (mid-summer) and 45.61 g (total of colonies A, B and D) in September (autumn). Deciduous forests are the most important foraging habitats for A. cerana japonica in the Satoyama landscape especially from spring to mid-summer when mass flowering of tall trees and shrubs species provides rich floral resources for developing bee colonies. On the other hand, the bees frequently foraged from herbaceous plant species in autumn when flowering of tree species reduces and herbaceous plant species have flowering peaks. In turn, the bees provide pollination services to a number of wild flowers blooming in various forest layers ranging from the canopy to the understory layer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据