4.0 Review

Synergism and antagonism in plant acclimation to abiotic stress combinations

期刊

TURKISH JOURNAL OF BOTANY
卷 45, 期 1, 页码 587-600

出版社

TUBITAK SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL TURKEY
DOI: 10.3906/bot-2108-45

关键词

Abiotic stress; gene expression; posttranslational modification; RNA fate; signaling; small molecules; stress combinations

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DI346]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plants adapt to their environment through complex molecular mechanisms, with various physiological states realized through different environmental stresses. Interference phenomena involve synergism, antagonism, and indifference. Posttranslational modifications, gene expression regulation, and other molecular controls play key roles in plant acclimation.
Acclimation of plants to their environment involves mechanisms at all molecular levels and only the complete temporal and spatial pattern adequately describes the acclimation state. The diversity of physiological states realized in plants increases by the essentially infinite combinations of abiotic and biotic stresses, considering duration, impact order, and strength. The interference between stressors involves phenomena of synergism, antagonism, and indifference. This review exemplarily sketches principles of interference considering posttranslational modifications, the formation of molecular assemblies in regulosomes, the regulation of gene expression, and the vast number of other posttranscriptional controls e.g., in RNA processing and recruitment to ribosomes. Small molecules such as hormones, reactive molecular species as ROS, ions, and metabolites are decisive players in this network. Available methodology for global analysis combined with machine learning approaches offers a perspective to identify the central regulatory modules, particularly if the multiple layers of molecular regulation are included in parallel, and to better understand the underlying mechanisms of stress interference in an unbiased manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据