期刊
GERONTOLOGIST
卷 61, 期 8, 页码 E410-E420出版社
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnaa097
关键词
Behavioral engagement; Caregiving; Instrument development; Psychometrics
类别
资金
- NIH/NINR [NR011455-04, NCT02269956]
The study developed and tested the Mealtime Engagement Scale (MES), which showed good internal consistency, interrater reliability, and validity. The MES had adequate content validity, strong concurrent validity with the Relational Behavior Scale (RBS), and fair convergent validity with the Mealtime Relational Care Checklist (M-RCC). Further testing with diverse samples in various care settings is needed to gather more psychometric evidence.
Background and Objectives Mealtime engagement is defined as verbal and nonverbal assistance provided by caregivers to guide and motivate care recipients in eating. Quality mealtime engagement is critical to improve mealtime difficulties and intake among older adults with dementia requiring eating assistance. Few tools are feasible and valid to measure mealtime engagement. This study developed and tested the Mealtime Engagement Scale (MES). Research Design and Methods Items were developed based on literature review and expert review and finalized based on content validity and corrected item-total correlation. A secondary analysis of 87 videotaped observations capturing 18 nursing home staff providing mealtime care to residents with dementia was conducted. Internal consistency, interrater reliability, and intrarater reliability were assessed. Concurrent and convergent validity were examined through correlation (r(s)) with the Relational Behavior Scale (RBS) and the Mealtime Relational Care Checklist (M-RCC), respectively. Results The 18-item MES was developed with adequate content validity (Scale-content validity index [CVI] = 1.00; Scale-CVI/Average = 0.962-0.987). Each item is scored from 0 (never) to 3 (always). The total scale score ranges from 0 to 54. Higher scores indicate greater mealtime engagement. The MES had very good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.837), outstanding interrater reliability (interclass correlation = 0.920), outstanding intrarater reliability (interclass correlation = 0.956), adequate concurrent validity based on strong correlation with the RBS (r(s) = 0.821, p < .001), and fair convergent validity based on weak correlation with the M-RCC (r(s) = 0.219, p = .042). Discussion and Implications Findings provide preliminary psychometric evidence of MES to measure mealtime engagement. Future testing is needed among more and diverse samples in different care settings to accumulate psychometric evidence.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据