4.7 Article

Experimental study on crack width and crack spacing for Glass-FRP reinforced concrete beams

期刊

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
卷 131, 期 -, 页码 231-242

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.007

关键词

Reinforced concrete; Fibre reinforced polymers; Crack width; Crack spacing; DIC

资金

  1. Spanish Government (Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion) [BIA2013-46944-C2-2-P]
  2. Hughes Brothers, Inc.
  3. People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme
  4. ACCIO (Generalitat de Catalunya) under REA [600388]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fibre Reinforced Polymers (FRP) have been proven to be adequate substitutes for steel reinforcement under aggressive environments for flexural Reinforced Concrete (RC) elements. Their mechanical properties, basically their lower modulus of elasticity, derive in larger crack widths and deflections, in particular when Glass-FRP (GFRP) bars are used. Moreover, their different bond behaviour, mainly due to their mechanical properties and different surface configurations, make necessary to assess the available equations to determine crack width need to be assessed. This paper presents a study on the cracking behaviour of GFRP RC elements based on the results of an experimental programme involving 15 beams. The paper studies the influence of the reinforcing material, phi/rho(eff) ratio, concrete cover, stirrup spacing and bond between the concrete and the reinforcement. For this purpose, two different types of GFRP and steel bars were used. The cracking behaviour (crack width and spacing) in the pure bending zone was analysed up to the service load. Crack width was consistently acquired by using a Digital Image Correlation (DIC) technique. The 2D full-field displacements of the pure flexural zone were registered using 4 digital cameras and commercial software that enables the evolution of the specimen cracks to be analysed. Finally, bond coefficients have been adjusted to different formulations in terms of crack spacing and crack width. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据