3.8 Article

Modulation of mRNA Expression of Monoacylglycerol Lipase, Diacylglycerol Lipase and Cannabinoid Receptor-1 in Mice Experimentally Infected with T. gondii

出版社

CELLULAR & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY RESEARCH CENTER
DOI: 10.22088/IJMCM.BUMS.10.2.149

关键词

Cannabinoid receptor-1; diacylglycerol lipase; endocannabinoid; monoacylglycerol lipase; Toxoplasma gondii

资金

  1. research council of Babol University of Medical Sciences [9809012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found a significant increase in MAGL and CB1 expression levels in the brains of Toxoplasma-infected mice, while DAGL expression remained unchanged, suggesting that T. gondii may disrupt the endocannabinoid signaling pathways, which are known to be involved in epilepsy as neurotransmitter modulators.
Toxoplasma gondii, an obligate intracellular parasite, infects more than 30% of world's population. This parasite is considered to be neurotropic, and has high tropism for the central nervous system, and potentially induces cryptogenic epilepsy by no clear mechanism. The current study aimed to investigate the alteration of the main components of the endocannabinoid signaling systems in T. gondii-infected mice. For this purpose, the levels of mRNA expression of monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL), diacylglycerol lipase (DAGL) and cannabinoid receptor-1 (CB1), were measured by quantitative real time PCR.The mRNA expression level of MAGL was increased by similar to 8-fold in the brains of the Toxoplasma-infected group in comparison with non-infected mice (P<0.0001). The mRNA expression of CB1 gene in the brain of the infected mice was similar to 2 times higher than that measured in control group (P< 0.01). The mRNA expression level of DAGL remained unchanged in the infected mice. Overall a substantial increase in MAGL and CB1 expression without any changes in DAGL, in the brain of infected mice suggests that T. gondii disturbs the endocannabinoid signaling pathways, which are known as neurotransmitter modulators involved in epilepsy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据