4.1 Article

2021 Brazilian Thoracic Association recommendations for the management of severe asthma

期刊

JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE PNEUMOLOGIA
卷 47, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

SOC BRASILEIRA PNEUMOLOGIA TISIOLOGIA
DOI: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20210273

关键词

Asthma/therapy; Asthma/drug therapy; Asthma/prevention & control; Antibodies, monoclonal, humanized

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advances in understanding severe asthma as a complex and heterogeneous disease have led to new approaches in diagnosis and treatment, with an emphasis on personalized management and selection of biologicals. The importance of evaluating treatment response is also highlighted.
Advances in the understanding that severe asthma is a complex and heterogeneous disease and in the knowledge of the pathophysiology of asthma, with the identification of different phenotypes and endotypes, have allowed new approaches for the diagnosis and characterization of the disease and have resulted in relevant changes in pharmacological management. In this context, the definition of severe asthma has been established, being differentiated from difficult-to-control asthma. These recommendations address this topic and review advances in phenotyping, use of biomarkers, and new treatments for severe asthma. Emphasis is given to topics regarding personalized management of the patient and selection of biologicals, as well as the importance of evaluating the response to treatment. These recommendations apply to adults and children with severe asthma and are targeted at physicians involved in asthma treatment. A panel of 17 Brazilian pulmonologists was invited to review recent evidence on the diagnosis and management of severe asthma, adapting it to the Brazilian reality. Each of the experts was responsible for reviewing a topic or question relevant to the topic. In a second phase, four experts discussed and structured the texts produced, and, in the last phase, all experts reviewed and approved the present manuscript and its recommendations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据