3.9 Article

Folding Stability and Self-Association of a Triplet-Repeat (CAG)20 RNA Hairpin in Cytomimetic Media

期刊

CHEMSYSTEMSCHEM
卷 3, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/syst.202000052

关键词

cytomimetic media; fast relaxation imaging; molecular crowding; RNA folding; RNA stability

资金

  1. German Research Foundation [DFG-SPP 2191, 402723784]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research has focused on the relationship between RNA molecules with trinucleotide repeat expansions and neurodegenerative diseases, primarily aiming to understand how they fold and function in disease progression. Functional studies in cells can reveal additional aspects of RNA behavior, while invitro studies mainly focus on sequence structure, stability, and self-assembly. Specific interactions with the unfolded state have been found to contribute to destabilization and aggregation of RNA in cellular lysate.
RNA molecules with trinucleotide repeat expansions are involved in the pathology of various neurodegenerative diseases, such as Huntington's disease. A central research objective is to understand how trinucleotide repeat RNAs fold and function in disease progression. Studies that investigate the sequence structure, stability and self-assembly of such RNAs mainly focused on invitro methods in dilute aqueous solution. Functional studies in cells reveal further aspects of transport, protein association or assembly in phase separated compartments. Our study aims to understand governing factors for folding stability of trinucleotide repeats on the cellular level by assessing the influence of key components of the cellular medium invitro. We investigate (CAG)(20) RNA in complex and cytomimetic media using Fast Relaxation Imaging. Using distinct cosolutes we analyze the different enthalpic and entropic contributions that determine folding stability. We find a remarkable destabilization and aggregation of the RNA in cellular lysate that can be attributed to specific and non-specific interactions with the unfolded state.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据