4.7 Article

Height of the mining-induced fractured zone above a coal face

期刊

ENGINEERING GEOLOGY
卷 216, 期 -, 页码 140-152

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.11.024

关键词

Fracture zone; Empirical formula; Similar material model; Particle flow code; Key stratum; Site observation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51304128, 51674158]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20133718120013]
  3. Shandong University of Science and Technology Research Fund [2015JQJH105]
  4. Taishan Scholar Talent Team Support Plan for Advantaged & Unique Discipline Areas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development height of a gas conducting fracture zone (GFZ) in the gob overlying strata is crucial to the gas drainage and safe production of a coal mine. In order to address the issues of excessive gas concentration and uncertain GFZ height in No. 7435 Face overlying strata of Kongzhuang Coal Mine, China, the caving characteristics of overlying strata were explored using both physical experiments on similar materials and numerical simulations of Particle Flow Code (PFC) software and verified each other. The relationship of cracks development to porosity changing characteristics was introduced to quantitatively determine the height of the local GFZ. The quantified GFZ heights were compared with those measured using the in-situ drilling flow method. The results showed that 1) PFC software could accurately simulate the overlying strata caving behaviors, thus saving manpower, materials and financial resources needed for related physical experiments, and 2) the temporospatial distribution characteristics of porosity could be used to forecast GFZ height, and are of significant importance for determination of GFZ. Overall, the conclusions are of engineering significance for accurate arrangement of boreholes for gas drainage and reduction of mine gas disasters. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据