Magical disruption? Alternative protein and the promise of de-materialization

Along with seeking to eliminate the inhumane conditions and slaughter involved in animal protein production, alternative protein companies aspire to ameliorate its environmental impacts. They claim to do so by making edible protein from (nearly) nothing, drawing on abundant or mundane resources that will presumably not be missed or have no negative externalities, or upcycling byproducts that would otherwise be wasted-to de-materialize in other words. At the same time, these entrepreneurs promise their substitutes will be nutritionally analogous to or better than animal-based proteins and have only salubrious effects on human bodies. Drawing on data collected on alternative protein companies that are based in or have come through Silicon Valley, this article catalogs and examines company representations of their various de-materialization promises. We find that attempting to meet the tripartite, yet competing imperatives of Silicon Valley innovation, namely disruption, transparency, and secrecy, results in representations of processes that obfuscate more than they reveal. The resulting obfuscation is not simply the intentional veiling of pernicious processes; more than selling specific food products, Silicon Valley food tech entrepreneurs aspire to bring a new food system into being and convince their audiences that this food future is both better and achievable. Nevertheless, their representational practices make it difficult, if not impossible, for the public-or anyone really-to meaningfully assess the promises and their potential consequences, much less hold their proponents accountable to anything but pecuniary concerns.

Automated summary

Alternative protein companies aim to reduce the inhumane and environmental impacts of animal protein production by creating edible proteins from abundant or mundane resources, but their representations of the process are often vague and opaque, making it difficult for the public to assess the promises and potential consequences effectively.