4.7 Article

Decomposing inequality in energy-related CO2 emissions by source and source increment: The roles of production and residential consumption

期刊

ENERGY POLICY
卷 107, 期 -, 页码 698-710

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.003

关键词

Energy-related CO2 emissions; Gini coefficient; Source increment decomposition; Production sector; Residential sector

资金

  1. Program for the Major Projects in Philosophy and Social Science Research of the Ministry of Education of China [14JZD031]
  2. Key Program of National Social Science Fund of China [15AJY005]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71473203, 71171001, 71471001]
  4. New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-12-0595]
  5. Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of Southwestern University of Finance and Economics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using provincial data on energy-related CO2 emissions in China from 1997 to 2014 and the CO2 emission Gini coefficient (CEG), this study evaluates China's spatial inequality in energy-related CO2 emissions. Further, we decompose this inequality and its variation from the perspectives of production and residential energy consumption, using the source decomposition and source increment decomposition methods. This paper presents a new CEG source increment decomposition method that can achieve complete decomposition. The results reveal a downward trend in China's overall, production sector and residential sector CO2 emissions inequality. Although the Gini coefficient of CO2 emissions from the residential sector is larger than that from the production sector, the contribution of the latter to the overall CEG is higher. The impacts of the spatial inequality of CO2 emissions from China's production and residential sectors depend on the type of energy. The concentration effect is the primary factor responsible for inducing changes in China's overall and production sector CO2 emissions inequality, but it is not the only dominant factor for the residential sector CO2 emissions inequality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据