4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

The roles of countries in the international fossil fuel trade: An emergy and network analysis

期刊

ENERGY POLICY
卷 100, 期 -, 页码 365-376

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.025

关键词

Fossil fuel; International trade; Role of country; Emergy; Complex network

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71173199, 41271547]
  2. Key Laboratory of Carrying Capacity Assessment for Resource and Environment, Ministry of Land and Resources [CCA2016.10]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2-9-2015-303]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A better understanding of the roles of countries in the international fossil fuel trade is crucial for trade security and policy optimization. This study aims to provide a new way to quantitatively analyze the roles of countries in the international fossil fuel trade by complex network analysis and Emergy theory. We transform the trade quantity of coal, crude oil and natural gas into emergy and the sum of the three emergies is the emergy of fossil fuel. We build up network models of fossil fuel based on the value of fossil fuel emergy. Then, the top relationships, the central position, the intermediary ability of the countries, and the roles of countries in the trade groups were used to analyze the roles of countries in the international fossil fuel trade network. We choose four countries, the USA, China, Russia and Saudi Arabia, as examples to show the analysis of roles and policy implications. We suggest that the USA and Russia should try to improve their intermediary abilities by diversifying their trade orientations and pay more attention to building up relationships with countries in different communities. China should seek for more tight relationships with other countries to improve its central position, and more pipelines connecting China, Russia, and other Middle Asia countries are needed. As for Saudi Arabia, expanding its industrial chain of crude oil is a better way to deal with the more fierce competition in the market. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据