4.6 Article

From a locality-principle for new physics to image features of regular spinning black holes with disks

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/073

关键词

modified gravity; quantum black holes; GR black holes; astrophysical black holes

资金

  1. VILLUM fonden [29405]
  2. [NIF/R1/191008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the true nature of black holes by constructing regular black-hole spacetimes based on new-physics models, characterizing them by curvature invariants, and analyzing features such as the shadow shape and photon rings. Simulated images of the regular spinning black hole are generated to test the visibility of characteristic features in the intensity map, providing insights into the new-physics effects.
Current observations present unprecedented opportunities to probe the true nature of black holes, which must harbor new physics beyond General Relativity to provide singularity-free descriptions. To test paradigms for this new physics, it is necessary to bridge the gap all the way from theoretical developments of new-physics models to phenomenological developments such as simulated images of black holes embedded in astrophysical disk environments. In this paper, we construct several steps along this bridge. We construct a novel family of regular black-hole spacetimes based on a locality principle which ties new physics to local curvature scales. We then characterize these spacetimes in terms of a complete set of curvature invariants and analyze the ergosphere and both the outer event as well as distinct Killing horizon. Our comprehensive study of the shadow shape at various spins and inclinations reveals characteristic image features linked to the locality principle. We also explore the photon rings as an additional probe of the new-physics effects. A simple analytical disk model enables us to generate simulated images of the regular spinning black hole and test whether the characteristic image-features are visible in the intensity map.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据