4.3 Article

INCSA-UNET: SPATIAL ATTENTION INCEPTION UNET FOR AERIAL IMAGES SEGMENTATION

期刊

COMPUTING AND INFORMATICS
卷 40, 期 6, 页码 1244-1262

出版社

SLOVAK ACAD SCIENCES INST INFORMATICS
DOI: 10.31577/cai_2021_6_1244

关键词

Segmentation; deep learning; CNN; INCSA-UNET; attention

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Building segmentation from aerial images is crucial for urban planning and population estimation. UNET, combined with Inception blocks, implements a two-level Inception approach to enhance feature extraction and prevent overfitting. The proposed INCSA-UNET architecture shows significant improvement in terms of F1 and Kappa quantitative measures without significantly increasing the number of parameters.
Building segmentation from aerial images is essential in applications such as facilitating urban planning and estimating the population. Fully convolutional networks (FCNs) and especially UNET have achieved promising results in segmentation problems, after deep learning methods have significantly advanced the performance of many computer vision problems. However, in Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) with the standard convolution operations, there are problems such as the overfitting and precise extraction of the boundaries of the objects with different sizes and shapes. In this study, we have used Inception blocks with UNET to enhance feature extraction by implementing two-level Inception approach covering the entire encoding stage. In the proposed architecture, structured form of dropout (DropBlock) is used to prevent overfitting, and spatial/channel attention modules are applied to enhance important features by focusing key areas. We evaluate the proposed INCSA-UNET architecture on publicly available Massachusetts dataset and apply two fold cross-validation experiments for better analyzes. The experimental results show that the proposed architecture does not significantly increase the number of parameters of UNET and has a significant improvement in terms of F1 and Kappa quantitative measures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据