4.7 Article

Micro-kinetic modeling study of dry reforming of methane over the Ni-based catalyst

期刊

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
卷 153, 期 -, 页码 526-537

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.10.022

关键词

Dry reforming of methane (DRM); Micro-kinetic modeling; Ni catalyst; Kinetically relevant steps (KRS); Sensitivity analysis (SA); Hierarchical chemistry reduction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51206200]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [106112016CDJZR145507]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dry reforming of methane (DRM) creates an opportunity to produce syngas using the shale gas and CO2. In the present work, a comprehensive and thermodynamically consistent micro-kinetic modeling was carried out for the DRM reaction under different reaction conditions. In order to reveal the complicated kinetics evolution, a rigorous descriptor (H2O/H-2) and a rough descriptor (CO2/CH4) were identified due to their correlations with the theta(o)/theta(*) ratio, dominant reaction pathway (DRP) and kinetically relevant steps (KRS). Moreover, the evolution of DRP and KRS along the descriptors under different reaction conditions were elucidated using the combined analyses of reaction pathway, sensitivity and partial equilibrium. It shows that at the high temperature, DRM is predominated by the first C-H bond rupture via the direct and/or O*-assisted mode; CO2 adsorption becomes kinetically relevant at the low descriptor. At the high total pressure, (CH2* + *) and (CH4* + O* would become the KRS at the low and high descriptors, respectively. In the end, hierarchical chemistry reduction gave two reduced mechanisms and an overall kinetics equation, with which main kinetics features could be predicted. Concept of descriptors seems to be generalized into other oxidation chemistries (e.g., steam reforming, RWGS and oxidative dehydrogenation) and provides insights into the reactor design and reaction optimization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据