4.7 Article

Natural gas dehydration by molecular sieve in offshore plants: Impact of increasing carbon dioxide content

期刊

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
卷 149, 期 -, 页码 760-773

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.03.005

关键词

Natural gas; Dehydration; Adsorption; Temperature swing adsorption; Zeolite molecular sieve; Carbon dioxide

资金

  1. CNPq-Brazil
  2. CAPES-Brazil
  3. Petrobras

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dehydration is a critical operation in natural gas conditioning as it reduces the potential for corrosion, hydrate formation and freezing in process equipment and transportation pipelines. Water dew point adjustment is particularly challenging in the remote ultra-deepwater natural gas reserves of the Brazilian Pre-Salt fields due to their very high carbon dioxide contents - from 30% up to 90% in raw natural gas - which is a consequence from the carbonaceous rock of the reservoir structure and long term elevation of carbon dioxide content due to its injection for early enhanced oil recovery. Under this scenario, the study evaluates the impact of the carbon dioxide content of the natural gas on the performance of water dew point via water adsorption on 4 A Zeolite molecular sieve beds. Process simulation with adsorption simulator Adsim (Aspen Technology, Inc), at varying operation pressures and carbon dioxide contents in raw natural gas, indicated that, although adsorption meets water removal specification in a condensation free operation, the high fugacity of carbon dioxide penalizes the dehydration performance due to probably two facts: (i) higher carbon dioxide fugacity in the humid natural gas imply higher saturation water content in the gas phase, which increases the service of dehydration units; and (ii) higher carbon dioxide fugacity in the humid natural gas establishes a discreet adsorption competition with water resulting in 6.5% increase of adsorbent bed volume for operating pressures of 35 bar or higher. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据