4.7 Article

A comprehensive study on pyrolysis kinetics of microalgal biomass

期刊

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
卷 131, 期 -, 页码 109-116

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.10.077

关键词

Microalgal biomass; Pyrolysis; Kinetic modeling; Activation energy; Thermogravimetric analysis

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, R.O.C. [MOST 102-2221-E-006-288-MY3, MOST 105-2811-E006-003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pyrolysis of microalgal biomass for biofuels production has attracted much attention. However, detailed degradation mechanism and kinetics of the process have not been fully explored yet. In this study, a non isothermal pyrolysis of microalga Chlorella vulgaris ESP-31 is thermogravimetrically investigated. Several kinetic models, from a single reaction to seven parallel reactions, are tested to fit the experimental pyrolysis data for finding out the optimal pyrolysis model. The results show that the pyrolysis behavior of the microalga is somewhat different from that of lignocellulosic biomass, stemming from the inherent difference in their compositions. Overall, the kinetic modeling processes show that increasing the number of reactions improves the model fit quality. Curve fitting results indicate that the models consisting of three and less than three reactions are not suitable for microalga pyrolysis. The four-reaction model, via considering the pyrolysis of carbohydrate, protein, lipid and others, can be employed for modeling the thermal degradation; however, it cannot precisely predict the thermal degradation of the shoulder and the small peak. The conducted seven-reaction model further partitions the decomposition processes of carbohydrate and protein into two stages, and explains the thermal degradation well. The model indicates that the devolatilization peak is attributed to the combined degradation of Protein I and Carbohydrate II. The seven-reaction model offers the highest fit quality and is thus recommended for predicting the microalga pyrolysis processes. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据