4.5 Article

H3ABioNet genomic medicine and microbiome data portals hackathon proceedings

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/database/baab016

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Human Genome Research Institute of the National Institutes of Health (H3ABioNet project) [U24HG006941]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

African genomic medicine and microbiome datasets lack clear origin information, prompting the need for data portals development. The H3ABioNet network organized a hackathon to address this issue, resulting in significant progress on designing two portals. The participants worked collaboratively and highlighted the friendly atmosphere and diverse expertise within the teams.
African genomic medicine and microbiome datasets are usually not well characterized in terms of their origin, making it difficult to find and extract data for specific African ethnic groups or even countries. The Pan-African H3Africa Bioinformatics Network (H3ABioNet) recognized the need for developing data portals for African genomic medicine and African microbiomes to address this and ran a hackathon to initiate their development. The two portals were designed and significant progress was made in their development during the hackathon. All the participants worked in a very synergistic and collaborative atmosphere in order to achieve the hackathon's goals. The participants were divided into content and technical teams and worked over a period of 6 days. In response to one of the survey questions of what the participants liked the most during the hackathon, 55% of the hackathon participants highlighted the familial and friendly atmosphere, the team work and the diversity of team members and their expertise. This paper describes the preparations for the portals hackathon and the interaction between the participants and reflects upon the lessons learned about its impact on successfully developing the two data portals as well as building scientific expertise of younger African researchers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据