4.7 Article

Polyurethane foams with microencapsulated phase change material: Comparative analysis of thermal conductivity characterization approaches

期刊

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
卷 153, 期 -, 页码 392-402

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.08.019

关键词

Guarded hot plate; Hot box heat flux meter; Microencapsulated phase change material (mPCMs); Rigid polyurethane foams (RPU); Thermal conductivity; Transient plane source

资金

  1. University of Aveiro [FCT/UID/ECl/04450/2013]
  2. FCT/MEC [FCT/UID/ECl/04450/2013, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007679, UID/CTM/50011/2013]
  3. FEDER
  4. [EeB.NMP.2013-1]
  5. [609345]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of thermal insulation materials is regarded as the most effective passive measure of energy savings in buildings. Rigid polyurethane foams (RPU) are commonly used as the insulation layers of opaque building envelope solutions, as well as for other applications in field of transportation, textile industry and electrical appliances, accounting for almost one-third of the polyurethane market. In the assessment of the energy performance of buildings, insulation materials, such as RPU foams have good insulating properties - low thermal conductivity - however their thermal regulation capacity can be enhanced by the incorporation of phase change materials (PCMs). In this paper, three different approaches (flux meter approach, the guarded hot plate approach and the transient plane source approach) are presented to determine the thermal conductivity of RPU foams with and without the incorporation of PCMs based on steady state method and transient method. In addition, this work presents and discusses the comparison between measurements amongst the three approaches revealing the important factors that should be considered to determinate the thermal conductivity of the RPU foams with PCMs, particularly in the temperature range during PCMs phase change transition (solid/liquid state). (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据