4.7 Article

Dielectric-based 3D building-integrated concentrating photovoltaic modules: An environmental life-cycle assessment

期刊

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
卷 138, 期 -, 页码 514-525

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.12.038

关键词

Life cycle assessment (LCA); Concentrating photovoltaics (CPVs); 3D cross compound parabolic concentrator (CCPC); Building-integrated CPV (BICPV); Global warming potential (GWP); Cumulative energy demand (CED); ReCiPe; Eco-indicator 99 (E199); Ecological footprint; USEtox

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad of Spain [ENE2013-48325-R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The environmental profile of a dielectric-based 3D Building-Integrated Concentrating Photovoltaic (BICPV) device is investigated. Several scenarios and life-cycle impact assessment methods are adopted, including the newly-developed method ReCiPe. Multiple environmental indicators are evaluated for different cities: Barcelona, Seville, Paris, Marseille, London and Aberdeen. The results from the material manufacturing phase demonstrate that the PV cells and the concentrator are the components with the highest contribution to the total impact of the BICPV, based on ReCiPe, Eco-indicator 99, USEtox, CED (cumulative energy demand), GWP (global warming potential) according to different time horizons (20a, 100a, 500a) and Ecological footprint. Among the studied cities, Barcelona, Marseille and Seville present the lowest GWP and CED: less than 142g CO2.eq/kWh and less than 2.9 MJ(prim)/kWh, based on all the studied scenarios. Moreover, by considering 30-years lifespan, Barcelona, Marseille and Seville show 0.0107-0.0111 ReCiPe Pts/kWh while London, Paris and Aberdeen present 0.0161-0.0173 ReCiPe Pts/kWh. Results about greenhouse-gas-, energy-, ReCiPe-payback times and energy-return-on investment are also presented and critically discussed. In addition, comparisons with the literature and issues for the improvement of the environmental profile of the proposed system are included. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据