4.7 Article

Form stable composite phase change materials from palmitic-lauric acid eutectic mixture and carbonized abandoned rice: Preparation, characterization, and thermal conductivity enhancement

期刊

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
卷 154, 期 -, 页码 46-54

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.08.057

关键词

Palmitic-lauric acid eutectic mixture; Carbonized abandoned rice; Thermal conductivity; Phase change materials

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2652017361]
  2. National Natural Science Foundations of China [51472222, 51372232]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, novel form stable composite phase change materials (FS-CPCMs) from palmitic-lauric acid (PA-LA) eutectic mixture and carbonized abandoned rice (CAR) were prepared via vacuum impregnation. The CAR served as a good supporting material to prevent PA-LA from leaking and enhanced the thermal conductivity of PA-LA. SEM results showed that the CAR has a highly porous structure consisting of rough micro-pores and PA-LA did not leak from the CAR during the solid-liquid phase transition. DSC indicated that the latent heat and temperature of PA-LA/CAR FS-CPCMs during melt were 135.4J/g and 343 degrees C, respectively, whereas, these values were 124.8 Jig and 28.6 degrees C during freezing, respectively. The thermal conductivity of PA-LA/CAR FS-CPCMs was 1.83 times that of PA-LA. The heat storage/release rate of the. PA-LA/CAR FS-CPCMs is significantly more than that of PA-LA for practical applications. The results obtained from FTIR demonstrated that no new chemical bonds were formed between PA-LA and CAR. TGA and 200-cycle experiments showed that the PA-LA/CAR FS-CPCMs exhibit excellent thermal stability and form-stable performance. The PA-LA/CAR FS-CPCMs thus prepared were safe, environmentally friendly, and cost-effective; hence, they can be used as potential building materials for the applications of thermal energy storage. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据