4.7 Article

Application of typical and extreme weather data sets in the hygrothermal simulation of building components for future climate - A case study for a wooden frame wall

期刊

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
卷 154, 期 -, 页码 30-45

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.08.042

关键词

Climate change; Representative weather data; Hygrothermal simulation; Regional climate models; Wooden frame wall; Typical and extreme climate

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council (Formas)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A method for synthesizing representative weather data for future climate out of regional climate models (RCMs) was introduced previously for the energy simulation of buildings (Nik, 2016). The method suggests creating one typical and two extreme data sets based on the distribution of the outdoor dry bulb temperature (T-drybulb). This article extends the application of such weather data in the hygrothermal simulation of buildings by simulating a pre-fabricated wooden frame wall. To investigate the importance of considering moisture and rain conditions in creating the representative weather files, two more groups of weather data are synthesized based on the distribution of the equivalent temperature (T-equivalent) and rain. Moisture content, relative humidity, temperature and mould growth rate are calculated in the facade and insulation layers of the wall for several weather data sets. Results show that the synthesized weather data based on T-dry (bulb) predict the hygrothermal conditions inside the wall very similar to the original RCM weather data and there is no considerable advantage in using the other two weather data groups. This study confirms the applicability of the synthesized weather data based on T-dry (bulb) and emphasizes the importance of considering extreme scenarios in the calculations. This enables having distributions more similar to the original RCM data while the simulation load is decreased enormously. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据